One month later... this is the sequel to:
The same corner table at Grind Coffee had become Lena's unofficial office-a quiet refuge where she could lose herself in research without the fluorescent hostility of her corporate workspace. Today she was deep in Kate Raworth's Doughnut Economics, highlighting a passage about planetary boundaries when a familiar shadow fell across her table.
She looked up to find Mark Sullivan standing there, coffee in hand, wearing an expression she'd never seen before-something between sheepish and urgent, as if he'd been rehearsing this moment for weeks.
"Lena," he said, his voice carrying an unfamiliar note of uncertainty. "I'm glad I found you. I've been hoping to run into you."
She closed her book slowly, marking her place with deliberate care while studying his face. Something had shifted in his demeanor-the confident corporate polish had been replaced by something more raw, more human.
"Mark," she said cautiously.
"I owe you an apology," he said, settling into the chair across from her without invitation. "Our last conversation... I've been thinking about it. A lot. More than I probably should have."
Lena raised an eyebrow but said nothing, waiting.
"I may have been overly rigid in my position," he continued, his fingers drumming nervously against his cup. "I've done some reading since then. Not the-well, not the more sensationalized material, but some solid peer-reviewed research. The climate system is incredibly complex, and I was being reductive."
For the first time since he'd sat down, Lena felt her shoulders relax slightly. "It is complex. And it's... honestly refreshing to hear you engaging with the actual science."
Mark nodded earnestly. "The point is, I'm willing to concede that there's a real possibility-a non-trivial probability-that human industrial activity is a significant contributing factor to current warming trends. I won't go as far as calling it the primary driver, and I still think some of the more apocalyptic projections are overblown, but I can acknowledge that we may have a genuine problem on our hands."
Something shifted in Lena's expression-a crack of light breaking through clouds. She leaned forward, her voice taking on the animated quality it held when discussing solutions rather than problems.
"That's... that's actually huge, Mark. Really. Once you start seeing the connections-how our economic system externalizes environmental costs onto the global poor, how corporate power structures resist the systemic changes we need"
"Exactly," Mark interrupted, raising his hand with a slight smile. "Connections. That's exactly what I wanted to talk about. If I'm going to open my mind to one concerning trend driven by our modern industrial society, it's only fair that you consider another one that's equally data-driven and, in my view, far more urgent for the long-term viability of our civilization."
Lena nodded, her eyes brightening with curiosity. She was already mentally cataloging the possibilities-wealth inequality, biodiversity loss, the democracy crisis, the breakdown of social cohesion. Finally, someone willing to think systemically.
"Okay," she said, settling back in her chair. "I'm listening. What's the other trend?"
"Dysgenics."
The word dropped between them like a stone into still water. Lena's expression didn't just change-it underwent a complete metamorphosis, hope curdling into horror so quickly that Mark mistook her shocked silence for intellectual engagement.
"What did you just say?" The words came out barely above a whisper.
Mark leaned forward, his voice dropping to the conspiratorial tone of someone sharing profound insights. "The systematic decline in our genetic capital. It's the inverse of the climate problem, really. You're concerned about the degradation of our atmospheric commons. I'm concerned about the degradation of our cognitive commons."
Lena felt the blood drain from her face. She pushed her coffee away as if it had suddenly become toxic.
"The data is actually quite robust," Mark continued, apparently oblivious to her reaction. "Intelligence is highly heritable-twin studies consistently show this. And there's a strong negative correlation between fertility rates and educational attainment, IQ scores, future-time orientation. The most conscientious, forward-thinking people are having fewer children, while those least equipped to navigate complex systems or contribute to solutions are reproducing at higher rates."
"You're talking about eugenics," Lena said flatly, her voice hollow with disbelief.
"I'm talking about biological reality!" Mark's voice carried the fervor of someone who believed he was making a breakthrough argument. "You want me to accept that CO2 molecules are disrupting planetary systems. I'm asking you to accept that demographic patterns are disrupting our cognitive inheritance. Think about it-if we both acknowledge these as legitimate concerns, the solution becomes elegant: we encourage the right people-intelligent, environmentally conscious people like yourself-to have more children. For the planet's sake and for humanity's intellectual future."
Lena stood abruptly, her chair scraping against the floor with enough force to draw stares from nearby tables. Her hands shook as she gathered her belongings.
"There is no trade," she said, her voice quiet but carrying the cutting precision of surgical steel. "There is no elegant solution. There is no meeting halfway."
"Lena, be rational"
"I am being rational," she cut him off. "You are offering to grudgingly acknowledge a century of atmospheric physics in exchange for me endorsing a pseudo-scientific ideology that has been used to justify forced sterilizations, genocide, and the systematic dehumanization of entire populations."
Mark's face showed genuine confusion. "You're being emotional. The data on cognitive decline is"
"The data on 'cognitive decline' is cherry-picked garbage dressed up in scientific language to make racism respectable," Lena said, her voice rising despite her efforts at control. "You haven't changed at all, Mark. You've just found a more sophisticated way to tell me that my reproductive choices should serve your ideological project. Last month it was to combat a crisis you claimed wasn't real. This month it's to combat a crisis that exists only in the fever dreams of people who think the problem with the world is that the 'wrong' people are having babies."
She slung her bag over her shoulder, looking at him not with anger-anger would have been easier to bear-but with a kind of weary, profound disgust that seemed to encompass not just him but the entire worldview he represented.
"You want to know what the real crisis is, Mark? It's that people like you can look at a world burning from overconsumption and conclude that the problem is insufficient genetic quality in the poor. It's that you can acknowledge climate science exists and in the same breath ask me to validate the intellectual framework that gave us the Holocaust."
She paused at the edge of the table, her final words delivered with surgical precision:
"Don't approach me again. Don't try to make deals with my uterus or my conscience. Your vision of the future is a nightmare, and I want absolutely no part in helping you build it."
She turned and walked out, leaving Mark sitting alone with his cooling coffee and his wounded bewilderment. He genuinely couldn't understand what had gone wrong-he'd offered what seemed like a perfectly reasonable compromise, a meeting of minds between two intelligent people concerned about civilization's future.
Around them, the coffee shop continued its familiar rhythm-conversations flowing, laptops humming, the great human project of meaning-making carrying on as if the fundamental nature of humanity itself hadn't just been debated and found wanting at table seven.
The barista called out another order. The world kept turning. But some chasms, once revealed, can never be bridged.
Subscribe free to get weekly insights that don’t make it into mainstream coverage. Paid members unlock deep dives + exclusive apps for exploring the data yourself.
Sometimes what we mistake for compromise is actually the revelation of irreconcilable worldviews.