PifferPilfer

PifferPilfer

What Akbari’s Reply Gets Wrong About Science

Akbari’s response reveals a deeper confusion about citation, replication, and scientific credit

Davide Piffer's avatar
Davide Piffer
Apr 16, 2026
∙ Paid

I have now received a direct reply from Ali Akbari explaining why my earlier papers were not cited. That reply closes off the most charitable interpretation. This is no longer something that can be waved away as oversight, a missed paper, or a crowded reference list. The omission is now being defended on principle. And the principle is wrong. Nature’s o…

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Davide Piffer.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Davide Piffer · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture